Standards. There are insufficient data to support a treatment standard for this topic.
Guidelines. There are insufficient data to support a treatment guideline for this topic.
Options. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage can be considered as an option in the management of elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) in children with severe closed head injury.
Drainage can be accomplished via a ventriculostomy catheter alone or in combination with a lumbar drain. The addition of lumbar drainage should be considered as an option only in the case of refractory intracranial hypertension with a functioning ventriculostomy, open basal cisterns, and no evidence of a major mass lesion or shift on imaging studies.
In children with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and intracranial hypertension, ventricular CSF drainage is a commonly employed therapeutic modality in conjunction with ICP monitoring. The role of CSF drainage is to reduce intracranial fluid volume and thereby lower ICP. The scientific literature pertaining to CSF drainage in trauma, and in pediatric trauma in particular, was reviewed.
We searched Medline and Healthstar from 1966 to 2001 by using the search strategy for this question (see Appendix A) and supplemented the results with literature recommended by peers or identified from reference lists. Of 68 potentially relevant studies, three were used as evidence for this question (Table 1).
With the use of the ventriculostomy as a common means of measuring ICP of patients with TBI (see Chapter 7), the potential therapeutic benefits of CSF drainage became of interest. Before the use of the ventriculostomy in TBI, the principal use of CSF drainage was in patients with hydrocephalus, but the ability of this procedure to affect ICP led to its increased use as a therapeutic device.
We found one class III study in children evaluating the use of ventricular drainage in TBI. Shapiro and Marmarou
Drainage of CSF is not limited to the ventricular route. In response to observations that the ventricles are often small in TBI and that up to 30% of the total compliance of the CSF system is in the spinal axis, a series of articles have addressed the feasibility of using lumbar drains in addition to ventricular drainage. Baldwin and Rekate
Levy et al.
Following earlier reports of an effect on ICP by drainage of CSF
Fortune et al.
Ventricular CSF drainage in severe pediatric TBI is supported as a treatment option in the setting of refractory intracranial hypertension; the addition of lumbar drainage in patients showing open cisterns on imaging and without major mass lesions or shift also is supported as a treatment option.
Future studies in this area should include the following:
| Reference | Data Class | Description of Study | Conclusion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shapiro and Marmaron, 1982 | III | Retrospective series, 22 patients with EVD, ICP/PVI measured. | Drainage increased PVI, decreased ICP, deaths only in patients with uncontrolled ICP. |
| Baldwin and Rekate, 1991-1992 | III | Clinical series, five patients with lumbar drain. | Three of five survived after lowering ICP. |
| Levy et al., 1995 | III | Retrospective study, 16 patients with lumbar drain. | ICP lowered in 14/16, deaths in two patients with uncontrolled ICP. |